Case Study – 2015 Deutsche Bank Sanctions Enforcement Action – SB

—

Sponsored by: 

Simplify AML, supercharge your team

—

Introduction:

Deutsche Bank, one of the world’s largest banking and financial service companies, was in 2015 embroiled in a significant legal case involving sanctions enforcement actions. This case study investigates the 2015 Deutsche Bank sanctions enforcement action, highlighting its causes, the parties involved, the investigation, resolution, and its impacts on the industry.

Background:

In 2015, Deutsche Bank faced allegations for apparent violations of multiple sanctions programs implemented by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). The bank was accused of carrying out transactions for countries and entities under U.S. sanctions, including Iran, Syria, Libya, Myanmar, and Sudan, between 2007 and 2011.

Investigation and Findings:

OFAC initiated an investigation into Deutsche Bank’s alleged misconduct, finding that the bank had processed around 4,875 transactions, totalling over $277 million, which appeared to violate the U.S. sanctions laws. A major issue was the bank’s use of “non-transparent payment practices” and stripping of crucial information about the parties involved in transactions, which obscured the identity of those parties and prevented the detection of the violations.

Furthermore, Deutsche Bank’s compliance systems and controls were deemed insufficient for identifying and blocking transactions that were subject to U.S. sanctions. The bank was criticized for its lack of adequate risk management procedures and internal control systems that should have detected and prevented the transactions from occurring.

Resolution:

In November 2015, Deutsche Bank agreed to settle with OFAC for $258 million, a significant amount that reflected the magnitude of the violations. This settlement was divided between OFAC, the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS), and the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. Alongside the financial penalty, the bank also agreed to fire six senior employees involved in the sanctions violations and to implement improvements to its compliance programs.

Impacts on the Industry:

The Deutsche Bank sanctions enforcement action sent shockwaves throughout the financial industry, alerting institutions worldwide to the risks of non-compliance with international sanctions. It served as a reminder that financial institutions must have robust internal controls and compliance programs in place to prevent such violations.

The case underscored the importance of transparency in international transactions and led to increased scrutiny of the so-called ‘cover payments’ methods, which had allowed Deutsche Bank to disguise the details of the transactions. Post-2015, there was a marked effort in the banking sector to enhance systems for detecting and reporting any suspicious transactions.

Furthermore, the case highlighted the need for strict adherence to sanctions laws, even for non-U.S. financial institutions, given the global influence of U.S. financial systems and their central role in international finance.

Conclusion:

The 2015 Deutsche Bank sanctions enforcement action represented a pivotal moment in international finance, serving as a stark reminder of the regulatory risks that global banking institutions face. It has since driven significant reforms in the sector, with a strong emphasis on developing robust compliance programs, transparent transaction processes, and effective risk management systems. The banking industry has been reminded of the severe repercussions that can ensue from compliance failings, making the Deutsche Bank case an important milestone in global banking compliance history.